A Brief Note on How Phenomenal Objects Relate to Objects Themselves

Journal of Consciousness Studies 18 (11-12):199-202 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This brief note corrects some basic errors in Meijsing's JCS paper on 'The Whereabouts of Pictorial Space', concerning the status of phenomenal objects in the reflexive model of perception. In particular I clarify the precise sense in which a phenomenal object relates to the object itself in visual perception.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Thing and object.Kristie Miller - 2008 - Acta Analytica 23 (1):69-89.
The representational theory of phenomenal character: A phenomenological critique.Greg Janzen - 2006 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 5 (3-4):321-339.
Who is afraid of imaginary objects?Gabriele Contessa - 2009 - In Nicholas Griffin & Dale Jacquette (eds.), Russell Vs. Meinong: The Legacy of "On Denoting". Routledge.
Meinongian Objects.David W. Smith - 1975 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 1 (1):43-71.
On the objects and interpretants of signs: Comments on T. L. short's.Risto Hilpinen - 2007 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4).
Vague Objects and the Problem of the Many.Thomas Sattig - 2013 - Metaphysica 14 (2):211-223.
On the Objects and Interpretants of Signs: Comments on T. L. Short's Peirce's Theory of Signs.Risto Hilpinen - 2007 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4):610 - 618.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
35 (#445,257)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Max Velmans
Goldsmiths College, University of London

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references