Biosemiotics 10 (2):145-156 (2017)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
We argue that constructive approaches in epistemology and systems science, which are focused on normativity, knowledge, and communication of organisms and emphasize the primacy of activity, self-construction, and niche-construction in the cognitive agents, fit naturally to the both methodology and theory of biosemiotics. In particular, constructive view was already present in the works of the major precursors of biosemiotics: von Uexküll and Bateson, and to some extent Peirce. Biosemiotics has a chance to function as a mediating field in the theoretical integration of semiotics with its construction-related sister disciplines (e.g., second order cybernetics, autopoiesis, constructivism, enactivism, and interactivism) because of its explicit assumption of the semiotic nature of life and agency and its objectified “first person” view to biosemiotic agents, the view that nevertheless avoids the agnostic attitude towards reality.
|
Keywords | Biosemiotics Constructivism Autopoiesis Second-Order Cybernetics Interactivism Charles S. Peirce Jakob von Uexküll Gregory Bateson |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1007/s12304-017-9304-9 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Biosemantics.Ruth Millikan - 1989 - In Brian P. McLaughlin & Ansgar Beckerman (eds.), Journal of Philosophy. Oxford University Press. pp. 281--297.
Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living.Humberto Muturana, H. R. Maturana & F. J. Varela - 1973/1980 - D. Reidel Publishing Company.
View all 14 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Biosemiotics: A Functional-Evolutionary Approach to the Analysis of the Sense of Information.Alexei A. Sharov - forthcoming - Biosemiotics: The Semiotic Web.
Limitations on Applying Peircean Semeiotic. Biosemiotics as Applied Objective Ethics and Esthetics Rather Than Semeiotic.Tommi Vehkavaara - 2006 - Journal of Biosemiotics 1 (1):269-308.
Michael Polanyi’s Approach to Biological Systems and Contemporary Biosemiotics.Phil Mullins - 2017 - Tradition and Discovery 43 (1):6-31.
Biosemiotics and Constructivism: Strong Allies. Review of “Essential Readings in Biosemiotics” Edited by Donald Favareau.K. Bielecka - 2012 - Constructivist Foundations 7 (3):228-230.
Comprehending the Semiosis of Evolution.Alexei Sharov, Timo Maran & Morten Tønnessen - 2016 - Biosemiotics 9 (1):1-6.
Organisms Reshape Sign Relations.Alexei Sharov, Timo Maran & Morten Tønnessen - 2015 - Biosemiotics 8 (3):361-365.
Towards Synthesis of Biology and Semiotics.Alexei Sharov, Timo Maran & Morten Tønnessen - 2015 - Biosemiotics 8 (1):1-7.
On the Concept of Code in Linguistics and Biosemiotics.Prisca Augustyn - 2011 - Biosemiotics 4 (3):281-289.
Ecogenesis and Echogenesis: Some Problems for Biosemiotics.Walter A. Koch - forthcoming - Biosemiotics: The Semiotic Web.
Information in Biosemiotics: Introduction to the Special Issue. [REVIEW]Søren Brier & Cliff Joslyn - 2013 - Biosemiotics 6 (1):1-7.
Relational Ontology, Simondon, and the Hope for a Third Culture Inside Biosemiotics.Thierry Bardini - 2017 - Biosemiotics 10 (1):131-137.
Von Neumann’s Legacy for a Scientific Biosemiotics.Joachim De Beule - 2012 - Biosemiotics 5 (1):1-4.
Why and How to Naturalize Semiotic Concepts for Biosemiotics.Tommi Vehkavaara - 2002 - Sign Systems Studies 30 (1):293-312.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2017-08-13
Total views
23 ( #490,408 of 2,499,691 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,206 of 2,499,691 )
2017-08-13
Total views
23 ( #490,408 of 2,499,691 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,206 of 2,499,691 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads