Research in Phenomenology 32 (1):196-209 (2002)

This article examines Gadamer's claim that language is fundamentally metaphorical from the perspective of Ricoeur's complementary analysis of metaphor. I argue that Gadamer's claim can only be understood in relation to a broader understanding of metaphor in which metaphor is not regarded as secondary to literal meaning. From this context one is better able to understand the connection Gadamer makes between language and ontology, which is found in his statement "Being that can be understood is language.".
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/15691640260490638
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,091
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Limits of Definition: Gadamer’s Critique of Aristotle’s Ethics.Carlo DaVia - 2018 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26 (6):1176-1196.
Metaphors of Mindfulness.Bee Scherer & Jeff Waistell - 2018 - Contemporary Buddhism 19 (2):417-447.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
160 ( #73,127 of 2,506,134 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,380 of 2,506,134 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes