DRGs and the Ethical Reallocation of Resources

Hastings Center Report 16 (3):32-40 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

To allocate resources ethically under DRGs, we need an expanded medical ethics. Appealing to traditional patient-centred principles such as beneficence and autonomy will not be sufficient. We also need to take into account the social principles of full beneficence and justice. If marginal benefits must be eliminated, clinicians should not participate in deciding who should get less care but should remain committed to their patients' interests.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

DRGs: Justice and the invisible rationing of health care resources.Leonard M. Fleck - 1987 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 12 (2):165-196.
The Crisis of 2008: Lessons for and From Economics.Daron Acemoglu - 2009 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 21 (2-3):185-194.
Drgs and the idea of a just price.Thomas Halper - 1987 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 12 (2):155-164.
Do DRGs Affect Quality of Care?P. Gregory Strohm - 1984 - Hastings Center Report 14 (2):45-45.
A defense of two optimistic claims in ethical theory.Stuart Rachels - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 112 (1):1-30.
Age and the Allocation of Medical Resources.H. Kuhse & P. Singer - 1988 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (1):101-116.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
12 (#1,025,624)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Some Ethical Costs of Rationing.Paul T. Menzel - 1992 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 20 (1-2):57-66.
Some Ethical Costs of Rationing.Paul T. Menzel - 1992 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 20 (1-2):57-66.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references