Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 18 (1):147402221662912 (2016)

Abstract
Habermas and Arendt defend two contrasting accounts of discussion. While both accounts acknowledge the importance of knowledge as basis of discussion, Habermas emphasizes the aim of reasoned agreement and Arendt focuses on plural interpretative perspectives. I will explore the tension between the two accounts in order to clarify the phenomenon of discussion. In particular, I want to address the question whether the two accounts are incompatible or, rather, focus on different stages or practices of discussion that can be folded into each other.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1474022216629124
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,740
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Hermeneutics and Relativism: Wittgenstein, Gadamer, Habermas.Guy A. M. Widdershoven - 1992 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 12 (1):1-11.
Habermas y el concepto de poder en la obra de Arendt.Charles Kenney - 1991 - Areté. Revista de Filosofía 3 (2):233-252.
El poder comunicativo en Arendt y en Habermas.Mario Di Giácomo - 2011 - Revista de Filosofía (Venezuela) 69 (3):52-73.
Acceptance, Belief, and Descartes’s Provisional Morality.Adam Kadlac - 2007 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (1):35-52.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-06-30

Total views
21 ( #522,099 of 2,462,951 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #299,108 of 2,462,951 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes