Materteral and Avuncular Tendencies in Samoa
Human Nature 20 (3):269-281 (2009)
Abstract
Androphilia refers to sexual attraction and arousal to adult males, whereas gynephilia refers to sexual attraction and arousal to adult females. In Independent Samoa, androphilic males, most of whom are effeminate or transgendered, are referred to as fa’afafine, which means “in the manner of a woman.” Previous research has established that fa’afafine report significantly higher avuncular tendencies relative to gynephilic men. We hypothesized that Samoan fa’afafine might adopt feminine gender role orientations with respect to childcare activity. If so, then the fa’afafine’s femininity might be a proximate mechanism for promoting their elevated avuncular tendencies. Our analyses indicated that fa’afafine had significantly higher willingness to assist in the childcare of nieces and nephews than childless women, mothers, or men, none of whom differed from each other on this measure. Thus, femininity does not appear to explain the fa’afafine’s pattern of avuncular tendencies, nor the women’s pattern of materteral (i.e., aunt-like) tendencies, relative to gynephilic men. We discuss how the fa’afafine “third” gender status might influence the expression of their elevated avuncular tendenciesDOI
10.1007/s12110-009-9066-4
My notes
Similar books and articles
Male Androphilia in the Ancestral Environment.Doug P. VanderLaan, Zhiyuan Ren & Paul L. Vasey - 2013 - Human Nature 24 (4):375-401.
The Impact of Self-Esteem, Machiavellianism, and Social Capital on Attorneys' Traditional Gender Outlook.Sean Valentine & Gary Fleischman - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 43 (4):323 - 335.
Matrilateral biases in the investment of aunts and uncles.Steven J. C. Gaulin, Donald H. McBurney & Stephanie L. Brakeman-Wartell - 1997 - Human Nature 8 (2):139-151.
Kin Relationships and the Caregiving Biases of Grandparents, Aunts, and Uncles.Alexander Pashos & Donald H. McBurney - 2008 - Human Nature 19 (3):311-330.
Margaret Mead in Samoa.Martin J. Kelly - 1999 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1999 (116):169-174.
Differential use of sensory information in sexual behavior as a function of gender.Rachel S. Herz & Elizabeth D. Cahill - 1997 - Human Nature 8 (3):275-286.
Exotic becomes erotic: Interpreting the biological correlates of sexual orientation.Daryl Bem - manuscript
The Freeman-Mead Controversy Revisited: Or the Attempted Trashing of Derek Freeman.Ian Jarvie - 2013 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (4):531-541.
Discrimination, harassment, and the glass ceiling: Women executives as change agents. [REVIEW]Myrtle P. Bell, Mary E. Mclaughlin & Jennifer M. Sequeira - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 37 (1):65 - 76.
Management and ethical decision-making.Wade L. Robison - 1984 - Journal of Business Ethics 3 (4):287 - 291.
Sexual Orientation, Gender, and Families: Dichotomizing Differences.Susan Moller Okin - 1996 - Hypatia 11 (1):30 - 48.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-24
Downloads
223 (#56,675)
6 months
1 (#451,398)
2013-11-24
Downloads
223 (#56,675)
6 months
1 (#451,398)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Male Androphilia in the Ancestral Environment.Doug P. VanderLaan, Zhiyuan Ren & Paul L. Vasey - 2013 - Human Nature 24 (4):375-401.
Male Sexual Orientation and Avuncularity in Canada: Implications for the Kin Selection Hypothesis.Deanna L. Forrester, Jessica L. Parker, Paul L. Vasey & Doug P. VanderLaan - 2011 - Journal of Cognition and Culture 11 (3-4):339-352.
Does Geographic Proximity Influence The Expression of Avuncular Tendencies in Canadian Androphilic Males?Miranda L. Abild, Paul L. Vasey & Doug P. VanderLaan - 2014 - Journal of Cognition and Culture 14 (1-2):41-63.
References found in this work
Sociobiology: The New Synthesis.Edward O. Wilson - 1975 - Journal of the History of Biology 33 (3):577-584.
Sexual Behavior in the Human Male.Alfred C. Kinsey, Wardell B. Pomeroy & Clyde E. Martin - 1953 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 15 (4):682-685.
Frameworks for an archaeology of the body.Tim Yates - 1993 - In Christopher Y. Tilley (ed.), Interpretative Archaeology. Berg. pp. 31--72.