The Monster Analogy: Why Fictional Characters are Frankenstein's Monsters

Substance 48 (1):63-86 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

They are artificial human analogues; uncanny mirrors of humanity that mortals construct and bring to life for their own capricious purposes. Once they get off their creators' desks and gain minds of their own, however, there is little hope of controlling or destroying them. It is rather surprising that Mary Shelley's Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus has not repeatedly been interpreted as an allegory of fictional characters.As this article will discuss, numerous literary theorists have foregrounded the paradoxical mimetic and artificial qualities of fictional characters, and the concurrent humanity and nonhumanity of Frankenstein's creation is even more difficult to ignore. Yet, never before have...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Fictional characters and literary practices.Amie L. Thomasson - 2003 - British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (2):138-157.
Fictional characters.Stacie Friend - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 2 (2):141–156.
On Fictional Characters as Types.Enrico Terrone - 2017 - British Journal of Aesthetics 57 (2):161-176.
Frankenstein lives on.Belt Henk - 2018 - Science 359 (6372):137.
Could Sherlock Holmes Have Existed?Hanoch Ben-Yami - 2010 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 10 (3):175-181.
Fictionalism About Fictional Characters Revisited.Stuart Brock - 2016 - Res Philosophica 93 (2):377-403.
Actualisme et fiction.Jérôme Pelletier - 2000 - Dialogue 39 (1):77-.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-03-15

Downloads
35 (#446,573)

6 months
8 (#347,798)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?