Stasis: Notes Toward Agonist Democracy

Theory and Event 20 (3):699-725 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The difficulty with democracy is always how to define the demos—the people. Can we think of democracy in a different way? My starting point is to ask what it would mean to take kratos (power) rather than demos as the starting point of the thinking of democracy. I will argue that this is consistent with Solon’s first democratic constitution and that it leads to a thinking of democracy in terms of agonism. Maybe such a conception of agonistic democracy will allow us to conceptualize as well as actualize a political space not predetermined by the “fickle multitude” that can be manipulated and is pray to the forces of populism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Agonism in divided societies.Andrew Schaap - 2006 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (2):255-277.
La démocratie sans demos.Catherine Colliot-Thélène - 2011 - Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Sharing democracy.Michaele L. Ferguson - 2013 - New York: Oxford University Press.
How do affected interests support global democracy?Vuko Andrić - 2017 - Journal of Global Ethics 13 (3):264-278.
Radical Democracy with what Demos?Larry Alan Busk - 2018 - Radical Philosophy Review 21 (2):225-248.
Agonistic democracy and constitutionalism in the age of populism.Danny Michelsen - 2022 - European Journal of Political Theory 21 (1).

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-02

Downloads
14 (#934,671)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Dimitris Vardoulakis
University of Western Sydney, Hawkesbury

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references