The Trouble with Tracing

Midwest Studies in Philosophy 29 (1):269-291 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many prominent theories of moral responsibility rely on the notion of “tracing,” the idea that responsibility for an outcome can be located in (i.e., “traced back to”) some prior moment of control, perhaps significantly antecedent to the proximate sources of a considered action. In this article, I show how there is a problem for theories that rely on tracing. The problem is connected to the knowledge condition on moral responsibility. Many prima facie good candidate cases for tracing analyses appear to violate the knowledge condition on moral responsibility. So, either we need to dispense with tracing approaches or we must refine our understanding of the knowledge condition or we are responsible less frequently than we suppose.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Changes in grip tension following electric shock in mirror tracing.W. McTeer - 1933 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 16 (5):735.
Tracing the Sacred, Tracing the Face.Jules Simon - 2011 - Levinas Studies 6 (1):9-28.
An improved technique in the mirror-tracing experiment.C. E. Lauterbach - 1933 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 16 (3):451.
Non-Tracing Cases of Culpable Ignorance.Holly M. Smith - 2011 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (2):115-146.
Transfer of training in mirror tracing.B. E. Hall - 1939 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 25 (3):316.
Two concepts of the given in C. I. Lewis: Realism and foundationalism.Christopher W. Gowans - 1989 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 27 (4):573-590.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
256 (#76,132)

6 months
27 (#107,707)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Manuel Vargas
University of California, San Diego

Citations of this work

Should have known.Sanford C. Goldberg - 2017 - Synthese 194 (8):2863-2894.
Self-expression: a deep self theory of moral responsibility.Chandra Sripada - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (5):1203-1232.
Explaining (away) the epistemic condition on moral responsibility.Gunnar Björnsson - 2017 - In Philip Robichaud & Jan Willem Wieland (eds.), Responsibility - The Epistemic Condition. Oxford University Press. pp. 146–162.
A Sketch of a Theory of Moral Blameworthiness.Peter A. Graham - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (2):388-409.

View all 73 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Intention, plans, and practical reason.Michael Bratman - 1987 - Cambridge: Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility.John Martin Fischer & Mark Ravizza - 1998 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Mark Ravizza.
Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 1962 - Proceedings of the British Academy 48:187-211.
The Significance of Free Will.Robert Kane - 1996 - New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.
Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior.John M. Doris - 2002 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 56 references / Add more references