Lack of correlation between hypnotic susceptibility and various components of attention

Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1872-1881 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of our study was to measure the relationship between performance on various attentional tasks and hypnotic susceptibility. Healthy volunteers participated in a study, where they had to perform several tasks measuring various attention components in a waking state: sustained attention, selective or focused attention, divided attention and executive attention in task switching. Hypnotic susceptibility was measured in a separate setting by the Waterloo-Stanford Groups Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form C .We found no significant correlation between any of the attentional measures and hypnotic susceptibility. Highly hypnotizables did not prove to be superior to or worse than the other individuals in any of the tests.These results do not support the neuropsychophysiological model of hypnosis, as they show no consistent relationship between hypnotic susceptibility and waking attentional performance

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hypnotic susceptibility, EEG-alpha, and self-regulation.David R. Engstrom - 1976 - In Gary E. Schwartz & D. H. Shapiro (eds.), Consciousness and Self-Regulation. Plenum. pp. 173--221.
Hypnotic control of attention in the stroop task: A historical footnote.M. C. & W. P. - 2003 - Consciousness and Cognition 12 (3):347-353.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
22 (#669,532)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Reactions toward the source of stimulation.J. Richard Simon - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (1):174.
Orienting of attention.M. I. Posner - 1980 - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 32 (1):3-25.

View all 6 references / Add more references