Authors
Helga Varden
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Abstract
Abstract: Kant and Arendt on Barbaric and Totalitarian Evil This paper starts by sketching Kant’s four ideal legal and political conditions—'anarchy,’ ‘despotism,’ ‘republic,’ and ‘barbarism’—before showing their usefulness for analyzing different political forces that may operate in any given society. Contrary to the common tendency in political philosophy to view our societies as either in the so-called ‘state of nature’ (‘anarchy’) or in ‘civil society’ (‘republic’), I propose that we might find ourselves in societies where aspects or ‘pockets’ of our lives are subject to any one of these (anarchic, despotic, republican, and barbaric) political forces. I then combine Kant’s ideas on barbaric evil with Arendt’s ideas on totalitarian evil, which gives us a four-fold conception of political evil. This fourfold distinction is then used to identify some types and patterns of destructive political forces as they occur in actual, historical societies, such as racist, sexist, or heterosexist violence and oppression.
Keywords political evil  Kant  Arendt  totalitarianism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Villalobos, J. (edt.), Radicalidad y episteme.Mª E. López Ortega - 1992 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 26:266.
Evil's Inscrutability in Arendt and Levinas.Imge Oranli - 2018 - Science Et Esprit 70 (3):341-362.
Between Banality and Radicality: Arendt and Kant on Evil and Responsibility.Javier Burdman - 2016 - European Journal of Political Theory 18 (2):147488511664072.
Between Banality and Radicality: Arendt and Kant on Evil and Responsibility.Javier Burdman - 2019 - European Journal of Political Theory 18 (2):174-194.
Arendt, Augustine and Evil.David Grumett - 2000 - Heythrop Journal 41 (2):154–169.
Arendt, Augustine And Evil[Abbreviati].David Grumett - 2000 - Heythrop Journal 41 (2):154-169.
Is Radical Evil Banal? Is Banal Evil Radical?Paul Formosa - 2007 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (6):717-735.
Hannah Arendt.Simon Swift - 2009 - Routledge.
Illuminating Evil: Hannah Arendt and Moral History.George Cotkin - 2007 - Modern Intellectual History 4 (3):463-490.
Moral Responsibility for Banal Evil.Paul Formosa - 2006 - Journal of Social Philosophy 37 (4):501–520.
Hannah Arendt on the Evil of Not Being a Person.Martin Shuster - 2018 - Philosophy Compass 13 (7):e12504.
Political Violence and Terror: Arendtian Reflections.Dana Villa - 2008 - Ethics and Global Politics 1 (3).

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-04-01

Total views
117 ( #94,639 of 2,462,325 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
51 ( #17,004 of 2,462,325 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes