Basic Problems of Mereotopology

In Nicola Guarino (ed.), Formal Ontology in Information Systems. Ios Press. pp. 29–38 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Mereotopology is today regarded as a major tool for ontological analysis, and for many good reasons. There are, however, a number of open questions that call for an answer. Some are philosophical, others have direct applicative import, but all are crucial for a proper assessment of the strengths and limits of mereotopology. This paper is an attempt to put sum order in this area.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mereotopology: A theory of parts and boundaries.Barry Smith - 1996 - Data and Knowledge Engineering 20 (3):287–303.
Elementary polyhedral mereotopology.Ian Pratt-Hartmann & Dominik Schoop - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (5):469-498.
Mereotopological Connection.Anthony G. Cohn & Achille C. Varzi - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (4):357-390.
Ontologies for Plane, Polygonal Mereotopology.Ian Pratt & Oliver Lemon - 1997 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38 (2):225-245.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
485 (#37,296)

6 months
64 (#67,043)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Achille C. Varzi
Columbia University

References found in this work

Parts: a study in ontology.Peter M. Simons - 1987 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Parts: A Study in Ontology.Peter Simons - 1987 - Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
Sameness and substance.David Wiggins - 1980 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Parts of Classes.David K. Lewis - 1991 - Mind 100 (3):394-397.

View all 53 references / Add more references