Abstract
This paper studies Sentence 16 of Porphyry’s Pathways to the Intelligible. It is argued that it should be understood against the background of Plotinus’ discussions of the similes of the waxen block and the aviary from Plato’s Theaetetus. The first part of the paper concentrates on Plotinus’ reception of these similes. In the second part of the paper Plotinus’ discussions of the two similes are used to shed light on Sentence 16, in particular on the term προχείρισις. Furthermore it is argued that Porphyry does not reject Plotinus’ claim that, pace Aristotle, intellection does not require imaging
Keywords intellection   Procheirisis   phantasia   Theaetetus   sense-perception
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/187254710X524059
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,512
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Van Den Berg/Gabor Bibliography.Editors Proceedings of the Boston Ar - 2013 - Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 28 (1):238-240.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Case of Theaetetus.Gokhan Adalier - 2001 - Phronesis 46 (1):1 - 37.
The Case of Theaetetus.Gokhan Adalier - 2001 - Phronesis 46 (1):1-37.
Porphyry, Universal Soul and the Arabic Plotinus.Cristina D'Ancona Costa - 1999 - Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 9 (1):47.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-24

Total views
12 ( #813,265 of 2,520,967 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,457 of 2,520,967 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes