Teorías intitulacionistas de la justicia. De Nozick a Roemer y más allá

Ideas Y Valores 62 (152):249-265 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

"Entitlement theories of justice: From Nozick to Roemer and beyond", Economics and philosophy 1/1 : 69-81.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Feser on Nozick. [REVIEW]Peter Jaworski - 2005 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 7 (1):181-187.
The Withering of Nozick’s Minimal State.Jeffery E. Paul - 1979 - Philosophy Research Archives 5:275-285.
La noción plural de sujeto de justicia. Un nuevo reto para la filosofía.Lidia Palop - 2010 - Daimon: Revista Internacional de Filosofía:171-179.
Nozick's defense of closure.Peter Baumann - 2012 - In Kelly Becker & Tim Black (eds.), The Sensitivity Principle in Epistemology. Cambridge University Press. pp. 11--27.
Nozick's Wilt Chamberlain argument.Fabian Wendt - 2011 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Arguments in Western Philosophy. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 254–257.
The Possibility of Knowledge: Nozick and His Critics.Stephen Luper-Foy (ed.) - 1987 - Totowa, New Jersey: Rowman and Littlefield.
Algunas concepciones de la justicia.Agustín Squella - 2010 - Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez 44:175-216.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-08

Downloads
21 (#720,615)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Philippe Van Parijs
Catholic University of Louvain

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references