Sacrificing the Patrol: Utilitarianism, Future Generations and Infinity

Economics and Philosophy 13 (2):159-174 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Many people believe that we have responsibility towards the distant future, but exactly how far this responsibility reaches and how we can find a reasonable ethical foundation for it has not been answered in any definitive manner. Future people have no power over us, they form no part of our moral community and it is unclear how we can represent them in a possible original position. All these problems can be circumvented when you take an impersonal decision criterion like maximizing total or average utility. Such a sum-ranking criterion is neutral with respect to distance in time or space: my utility, my neighbour's and that of our descendants all carry the same weight. This makes future people an integral part of present decisions. Time-neutrality was defended by, among others, Sidgwick, Pigou and Ramsey.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moral Choice.Evelyn Keyes - 1985 - Dissertation, Rice University
Future Generations and Business Ethics.Ronald Jeurissen & Gerard Keijzers - 2004 - Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (1):47-69.
How should utilitarians think about the future?Tim Mulgan - 2017 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47 (2-3):290-312.
Discounting, Time Preference, and Identity.Shane William Frederick - 2000 - Dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University
The Theoria and Praxis of Obligations to Future Generations.Rex Charles Peebles - 2003 - Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin
Ethics, Energy Policy, and Future Generations.Peter Wenz - 1983 - Environmental Ethics 5 (3):195-209.


Added to PP

56 (#269,015)

6 months
9 (#210,105)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Infinite aggregation: expanded addition.Hayden Wilkinson - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 178 (6):1917-1949.
Intergenerational Justice Today.Andre Santos Campos - 2018 - Philosophy Compass 13 (3):e12477.
The ethics of burden-sharing in the global greenhouse. E. Wesley & F. Peterson - 1999 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 11 (3):167-196.
Infinite utility: Insisting on strong monotonicity.Luc Lauwers - 1997 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75 (2):222 – 233.
Social welfare relations and irregular sets.Ram Sewak Dubey & Giorgio Laguzzi - 2023 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 174 (9):103302.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The methods of ethics.Henry Sidgwick - 1874 - Bristol, U.K.: Thoemmes Press. Edited by Emily Elizabeth Constance Jones.
Utilitarianism: For and Against.J. J. C. Smart & Bernard Williams - 1973 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Bernard Williams.
Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong.Fred Feldman & J. L. Mackie - 1979 - Philosophical Review 88 (1):134.
The Methods of Ethics.Henry Sidgwick - 1890 - International Journal of Ethics 1 (1):120-121.

View all 14 references / Add more references