Argumentation 20 (4):381-392 (2006)

As an introduction to the special issue on Perspectives on Strategic Maneuvering, this article provides a synthetic recapitulation of the various steps that were taken in developing the pragma-dialectical theory of strategic maneuvering. First, the concept of strategic maneuvering is described as a means to reconcile the simultaneous pursuit of dialectical and rhetorical aims. Second, strategic maneuvering is related to the various kinds of argumentative activity types in which it takes place. Third, the concept of dialectical profiles is discussed and the parameters that are pertinent to distinguishing between different types of strategic maneuvering. Fourth, the fallacies are viewed as derailment of strategic maneuvering. Fifth, as a case in point, strategic maneuvering with inconsistency is examined
Keywords argumentation  argumentative activity type  dialectic  dialectical profile  fallacy  inconsistency  pragma-dialectics  rhetoric  strategic maneuvering  type of strategic maneuvering
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10503-007-9037-z
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,163
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Return to Reason.Stephen Edelston Toulmin - 2001 - Harvard University Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Ad Hominem Fallacies, Bias, and Testimony.Audrey Yap - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (2):97-109.

View all 38 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Strategic Maneuvering with Dissociation.M. A. van Rees - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (4):473-487.


Added to PP index

Total views
61 ( #187,196 of 2,506,520 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,244 of 2,506,520 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes