Response to William Lane Craig’s God over All

Philosophia Christi 21 (2):267-275 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In contrast to William Lane Craig’s view this article presents a sort of precis of my position on ontological commitment—whether you call it neo-Quineanism or not—and its implications for the nominalism-realism debate, a precis that proceeds from first principles.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

“Uncaused Beginnings” Revisited.Graham Oppy - 2015 - Faith and Philosophy 32 (2):205-210.
Response to Bridges and Van Inwagen.William Lane Craig - 2015 - Philosophia Christi 17 (2):291-297.
Arguing from Molinism to Neo-Molinism.Elijah Hess - 2015 - Philosophia Christi 17 (2):331-351.
Trinity.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 2015 - The Routledge Online Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Perils of Paul.William Hasker - 2004 - Philosophia Christi 6 (2):265-271.
Fairness and futility.Toby Betenson - 2016 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 79 (2):101-111.
Naturalism: A Critical Analysis. [REVIEW]G. Oppy - 2001 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (4):576-577.
Trinity Monotheism.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 2003 - Philosophia Christi 5 (2):375 - 403.
J. Howard Sobel on the Kalam Cosmological Argument.William Lane Craig - 2006 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36 (4):565-84.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-02

Downloads
121 (#145,195)

6 months
21 (#122,177)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Van Inwagen
University of Notre Dame

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references