Response to Steve Fuller, “‘China’ as the West’s Other in World Philosophy”

Journal of World Philosophies 3 (2):134-136 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Fuller’s critique of my work is based on the anthropological distinction between “functional” and “substantive” interpretations. However, he has used these terms in non-standard ways that may lead to confusion. Furthermore, in either the standard or Fuller’s senses of these terms, he has misdescribed my position.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

“China” as the West’s Other in World Philosophy.Steve Fuller - 2018 - Journal of World Philosophies 3 (1):157-164.
After the Gold Rush: Cleaning Up after Steve Fuller’s Theosis.William T. Lynch - 2018 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 48 (5):505-523.
Steve Fuller and Intelligent Design.Jeremy Shearmur - 2010 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (3):433-445.
The Path Taken and Not Taken in Social Epistemology.Steve Fuller - 2018 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 48 (5):530-536.
A Fuller Vision of Thomas Kuhn: Response to Roth and Mirowski.Steve Fuller - 2001 - History of the Human Sciences 14 (2):111-117.
Author’s response.Steve Fuller - 1998 - Metascience 7 (2):316-319.
Hegel's criticism of laozi and its implications.Wong Kwok Kui - 2011 - Philosophy East and West 61 (1):56-79.
On being buried with praise: A response to critics.Steve Fuller - 2005 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 38 (3):275-280.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-12-19

Downloads
9 (#1,176,028)

6 months
5 (#510,007)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references