- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Replies to discussion on the empirical
Philosophical Studies 121 (2):171-192 (2004)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Replies to discussion on the Empirical Stance.Bas C. van Fraassen - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 121 (2):171-192.
Replies to Discussion on "The Empirical Stance". [REVIEW]Bas C. Van Fraassen - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 121 (2):171 - 192.
Revisited Linguistic Intuitions.Jennifer Culbertson & Steven Gross - 2011 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (3):639 - 656.
Evolution, Neutrality, and Antecedent Probability: a Reply to Van Till and McMullin.Alvin Plantinga - 1991 - Christian Scholar's Review 21 (1):80-109.
Review: Replies to Discussion on "Logical Properties". [REVIEW]Colin McGinn - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 118 (3):453 - 461.
Modes and Transitions: Replies to the Discussion and Further Comments.David Laibman - 1987 - Science and Society 51 (2):179 - 188.
Review: Replies to Discussion on "The Possibility of Practical Reason". [REVIEW]David Velleman - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 121 (3):277 - 298.
Solomon's empirical/non-empirical distinction and the proper place of values in science.Sharyn Clough - 2008 - Perspectives on Science 16 (3):pp. 265-279.
‘Many Minds’ Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics: Replies to Replies.Michael Lockwood - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (3):445-461.
Book Review:The Philosophy of Nicholas Rescher: Discussion and Replies Ernest Sosa. [REVIEW]Timo Airaksinen - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (1):169-.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-10-27
Downloads
18 (#762,892)
6 months
3 (#760,965)
2013-10-27
Downloads
18 (#762,892)
6 months
3 (#760,965)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Kuhn vs. Popper on Criticism and Dogmatism in Science: A Resolution at the Group Level.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):117-124.
I—The Virtues of Relativism.Maria Baghramian - 2019 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 93 (1):247-269.
The empirical stance vs. the critical attitude.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2005 - South African Journal of Philosophy 24 (3):200-223.
Constraints on Rational Theory Choice.Seamus Bradley - 2017 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 68 (3):639-661.
A pragmatic, existentialist approach to the scientific realism debate.Curtis Forbes - 2017 - Synthese 194 (9):3327-3346.
References found in this work
Gideon Rosen on constructive empiricism.Bas C. Fraassen - 1994 - Philosophical Studies 74 (2):179 - 192.
Possibilities and Paradox; An Introduction to Modal and Many-Valued Logic.J. C. Beall & Bas C. van Fraassen - 2005 - Studia Logica 79 (2):310-313.
Discussion: Empiricism versus Metaphysics.James Ladyman - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 121 (2):133-145.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-67c5d994d4-wzg2g uwo