Ethical Perspectives 2 (3):107-129 (1995)
AbstractWe have already stated that Rawls situates his political liberalism within the liberal tradition. The practical meaning of so doing now becomes clear. Rawls presents his theory as a resource for public reflection and self clarification of that tradition. He hopes thereby to bring the process of reflection, which has occupied the liberal tradition for a considerable time, to some conclusion. One might also speak here of a hermeneutic turn in Rawls’ thought. His political philosophy does not withdraw from the world, nor does it claim to discover the truth by its own methods of reason, “apart from any tradition of political thought and practice.”. Rawls recognises that philosophical argumentation on its own is probably not in a position to lead to agreement.For this reason he considers it more fruitful to seek out “bases of agreement” which are implicit in the public culture of democratic societies and, more particularly, in their underlying conceptions of the person and of social cooperation. It is perhaps true that such “bases of agreement” are obscure and can be understood in a variety of ways. Rawls endeavours to show, however, precisely how such concepts can be understood, and how the notion of the original position can be used to connect them to certain principles of justice which themselves belong to the tradition of moral philosophy.Rawls is not seeking to give foundation to our moral insight; instead he sees the task of philosophy as consisting in showing the “coherence” of these insights with other ideas, thereby bringing order to our convictions, from the most general to the most particular. The original position plays a central role in this reflection. It must contribute to our attainment of an unimpeded vision of the demands of justice, if society is conceived as a scheme of fair cooperation between free and equal, reasonable and rational persons. Carried by the fundamental ideas of the liberal tradition, Rawls’ political philosophy must bring this tradition to unity and consensus
Similar books and articles
Political Liberalism and Political Compliance: Part 2 of the Problem of Political Compliance in Rawls’s Theories of Justice.Alan Carter - 2006 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 3 (2):135-157.
Liberalism After the Fall: Schmitt, Rawls and the Problem of Justification.David Dyzenhaus - 1996 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 22 (3):9-37.
The Evolution of Rawls's Justification of Political Compliance: Part 1 of the Problem of Political Compliance in Rawls's Theories of Justice.Alan Carter - 2006 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 3 (1):7-21.
Rawls on Pluralism and Stability.Robert B. Talisse - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 15 (1-2):173-194.
The Implicit Assumptions of Dividing a Cake: Political or Comprehensive? [REVIEW]Marianna Papastephanou - 2004 - Human Studies 27 (3):307-334.
The Coherence of Rawls's Plea for Democratic Equality.Percy B. Lehning - 1998 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (4):1-41.
Rawls’s Notion of the Political Conception as Educator.Steinar Bøyum - 2013 - European Journal of Political Theory 12 (2):136-152.
John Rawls: An Interpretation.Sebastiano Maffettone - 2001 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (3):189-216.
Legitimacy, Democracy and Public Justification: Rawls' Political Liberalism Versus Gaus' Justificatory Liberalism.Enzo Rossi - 2014 - Res Publica 20 (1):9-25.
Why Political Liberalism?: On John Rawls's Political Turn.Paul Weithman - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Civic Respect, Political Liberalism, and Non-Liberal Societies.Blain Neufeld - 2005 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 4 (3):275-299.
Reasonable Pluralism and the Domain of the Political: How the Weaknesses of John Rawls's Political Liberalism Can Be Overcome by a Justificatory Liberalism.Gerald F. Gaus - 1999 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 42 (2):259 – 284.
Testing the Limits of Liberalism: A Reverse Conjecture.Ali M. Rizvi - 2012 - Heythrop Journal 53 (3):382-404.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Emerging Technologies and Developing Countries: Stem Cell Research Regulation and Argentina.Shawn H. E. Harmon - 2008 - Developing World Bioethics 8 (2):138-150.
References found in this work
No references found.