Common Knowledge 18 (3):451-463 (2012)

Abstract
The term “pagan monotheism” was coined to describe monotheistic tendencies in Greco-Roman religion. Its usefulness has been strongly disputed on various grounds: for introducing a cognitive perspective on ancient religion, which was basically ritualistic; for implicitly taking Christianity as the norm by which to measure classical religion; and for confusing scholarly categories by classifying phenomena as monotheistic that are much better described as henotheistic. This article suggests that these arguments have been attempts to create a supposedly objective and universal scholarly vocabulary, while that new vocabulary would serve to obscure the history and ideological origin of the concepts it promoted. Arguing for a reflective, hermeneutical approach that incorporates an awareness of the origin and charged meanings of our concepts into scholarship, the author proposes methodological pluralism as a way out of these unfruitful terminological debates. Each concept sheds light on some aspects of reality while obscuring others. In particular, the often-criticized ambiguity and fuzziness of the term “pagan monotheism” may help us to formulate questions that otherwise would remain marginal in studies of ancient religion.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1215/0961754x-1630332
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,265
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monotheism and Pagan Philosophy in Later Antiquity.Michael Frede - 1999 - In Polymnia Athanassiadi & Michael Frede (eds.), Pagan Monotheism in Late Antiquity. Oxford University Press. pp. 41--67.
The Chaldaean Oracles: Theology and Theurgy.Polymnia Athanassiadi - 1999 - In Polymnia Athanassiadi & Michael Frede (eds.), Pagan Monotheism in Late Antiquity. Oxford University Press. pp. 149--183.
The Cult of Theos Hypsistos Between Pagans, Jews, and Christians.Stephen Mitchell - 1999 - In Polymnia Athanassiadi & Michael Frede (eds.), Pagan Monotheism in Late Antiquity. Oxford University Press. pp. 81--148.
The Fuzziness of “Paganism”.Christopher P. Jones - 2012 - Common Knowledge 18 (2):249-254.
Pagan Virtue and Christian Prudence.Charles Pinches - 1995 - Journal of Religious Ethics 23 (1):93 - 115.
Trinity Monotheism.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 2003 - Philosophia Christi 5 (2):375 - 403.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-13

Total views
34 ( #335,323 of 2,507,714 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,820 of 2,507,714 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes