Parasite-stress, cultures of honor, and the emergence of gender bias in purity norms

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (2):95-96 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Of the many far-reaching implications of Fincher & Thornhill's (F&T's) theory, we focus on the consequences of parasite stress for mating strategies, marriage, and the differing roles and restrictions for men and women. In particular, we explain how examination of cultures of honor can provide a theoretical bridge between effects of parasite stress and disproportionate emphasis on female purity

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Should Realists Say About Honor Cultures?Dan Demetriou - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (5):893-911.
Towards a model of host-parasite relationships.L. Dujardin & E. Dei-cas - 1999 - Acta Biotheoretica 47 (3-4):253-266.
Exploring social desirability bias.Janne Chung & Gary S. Monroe - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 44 (4):291 - 302.
Sexual Disorientation: Moral implications of gender norms.Peter Higgins - 2005 - In Lisa Gurley, Claudia Leeb & Anna Aloisia Moser (eds.), Feminists Contest Politics and Philosophy. PIE - Peter Lang.
Undoing Gender.Judith Butler - 2004 - Routledge.
Honor: a phenomenology.Robert L. Oprisko - 2012 - New York: Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
35 (#443,848)

6 months
6 (#522,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations