Neonatal Pain Relief and the Helsinki Declaration

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (4):803-823 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Helsinki Declaration is the universally accepted standard for ethical behavior in research involving human subjects. The Declaration calls for research studies to compare new therapies to the best current therapies. Despite this standard, multiple studies of pain relief interventions in newborns have recruited placebo controls instead of active controls using the best current therapy. These studies are evaluated using the standards required by the Helsinki Declaration, and the reasons for the ethical shortcomings of these studies are explored

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Disciplinary Actions and Pain Relief: Analysis of the Pain Relief Act.Sandra H. Johnson - 1996 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 24 (4):319-327.
After helsinki: Unresolved issues in international research.Ruth Macklin - 2001 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (1):17-36.
Placebo and the helsinki declaration — what to do?Bozidar Vrhovac - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1):81-93.
The Helsinki Declaration: why all the fuss?W. Tadd - 2000 - Nursing Ethics 7 (5):439-450.
The 2008 Declaration of Helsinki: some reflections.S. Giordano - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (10):598-603.
Do Doctors Undertreat Pain?William Ruddick - 1997 - Bioethics 11 (3-4):246-255.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
46 (#336,891)

6 months
17 (#142,297)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jae Svoboda
University of Louisville

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations