Kant, Husserl, McDowell: The Non-Conceptual in Experience

Diametros 41:99-114 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I compare McDowell′s conceptualism to Husserl′s later philosophy. I aim to argue against the picture provided by recent phenomenologists according to which both agree on the conceptual nature of experience. I start by discussing McDowell′s reading of Kant and some of the recent Kantian and phenomenological non-conceptualist criticisms thereof. By separating two kinds of conceptualism, I argue that these criticisms largely fail to trouble McDowell. I then move to Husserl’s later phenomenological analyses of types and of passive synthesis. Although Husserl appropriates McDowell’s idea of conceptually ‘saddled’ intuitions as a ‘secondary passivity’, I argue that he also provides a strong case for non-conceptual synthesis

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-09-12

Downloads
369 (#59,327)

6 months
85 (#70,523)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Corijn van Mazijk
University of Groningen

Citations of this work

Do We Have To Choose between Conceptualism and Non-Conceptualism?Corijn Van Mazijk - 2015 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 23 (5):645-665.
Kant and Husserl on bringing perception to judgment.Corijn Van Mazijk - 2016 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 8 (2):419-441.

Add more citations