In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics

Argumentation 27 (1):49-70 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to van Eemeren, argumentation theory is a hybrid discipline, because it requires a multidisciplinary, if not interdisciplinary approach, combining descriptive and normative insights. He points out that modern argumentation theorists give substance to the discipline by relying either on a dialectical perspective, concentrating on the reasonableness of argumentation, or on a rhetorical perspective, concentrating on its effectiveness. Both the dialectical and the rhetorical perspective are interpreted in ways related to how they were viewed by Aristotle, but in modern argumentation theory the relationship between the two, captured in Aristotle’s term antistrophos, is lost. According to van Eemeren, this relationship, which he considers crucial to a full-fledged argumentation theory, has been recovered in extended pragma-dialectics with the help of the theoretical notion of ‘strategic manoeuvring.’

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,764

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Question of Truth.David Botting - 2010 - Informal Logic 30 (4):413-434.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-14

Downloads
39 (#352,552)

6 months
5 (#243,444)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Fallacies.Charles Leonard Hamblin - 1970 - Newport News, Va.: Vale Press.
The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation.Chaïm Perelman & Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca - 1969 - Notre Dame, IN, USA: Notre Dame University Press. Edited by Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca.
The Uses of Argument.Stephen Toulmin - 1958 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

View all 32 references / Add more references