Galen, divination, and the status of medicine

Classical Quarterly 63 (1):337-352 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Galen's stories about his successes in predicting the development of an illness belong to the best-known anecdotes drawn from his writings. Brilliant pieces of self-presentation, they set Galen apart from his peers, who tried to cover up their ignorance by levelling accusations of magic and divination against their superior colleague. These accusations are usually interpreted as very real threats, as Roman law punished illicit magic and divination. Pointing out that Galen sometimes likes to present himself as a mantis and a prophet, others have suggested that the accusations against Galen and his own self-presentation indicate that the border line between medicine and religion was still fluid. Both approaches correctly draw attention to the social reality that the accusations betray: they suggest that Galen belongs to a group of healers of dubious standing that populated the empire and thus show that medicine did not have a monopoly on healing. Yet such a socio-historical approach may not be sufficient. For one thing, both explanations have their limitations. Regarding the former, it can be said that Augustus' prohibition of divination aimed at controlling prediction about the emperor and one can doubt that a widespread clampdown of all forms of divination ever was intended. A possible objection to the second view is that throughout his oeuvre Galen emphasizes his medicine as a rational undertaking, even as a science . If one takes his self-presentation as a mantis to be more than metaphorical and to indicate the not yet fully crystallized identity of medicine as a separate scientific discipline, then Galen's usual way of understanding his own craft as a ‘science’ is in need of explanation. Besides such possible objections, a different set of questions still needs to be asked: why precisely were accusations of practising magic and divination levelled against Galen and why do they recur so frequently in his writings? Why divination and not, say, poisoning?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Selected works. Galen & Galenus - 1997 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by P. N. Singer.
Galen's Critique of Rationalist and Empiricist Anatomy.Christopher E. Cosans - 1997 - Journal of the History of Biology 30 (1):35 - 54.
Method of Medicine. Galen & Galenus - 2011 - Loeb Classical Library. Edited by Ian Johnston & G. H. R. Horsley.
Galen: On Blood, the Pulse, and the Arteries. [REVIEW]Michael Boylan - 2007 - Journal of the History of Biology 40 (2):207 - 230.
Galen.Michael Boylan - 2002 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Galen and the world of knowledge.Christopher Gill, Tim Whitmarsh & John Wilkins (eds.) - 2009 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Galen and Astrology: A Mésalliance?Glen Cooper - 2011 - Early Science and Medicine 16 (2):120-146.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
47 (#329,840)

6 months
2 (#1,263,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Galen on the Limitations of Knowledge.”.R. J. Hankinson - 2009 - In Christopher Gill, Tim Whitmarsh & John Wilkins (eds.), Galen and the world of knowledge. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 206--242.
Staging the past, staging oneself Galen 0n Hellenistic exegetical traditions.Heinrich von Staden - 2009 - In Christopher Gill, Tim Whitmarsh & John Wilkins (eds.), Galen and the world of knowledge. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Numenius.Michael Frede - 1987 - In Wolfgang Haase (ed.), Philosophie, Wissenschaften, Technik. Philosophie. De Gruyter. pp. 1034-1076.
The Patient's Choice: A New Treatise By Galen.Vivian Nutton - 1990 - Classical Quarterly 40 (01):236-.
Galen on the astronomers and astrologers.G. J. Toomer - 1985 - Archive for History of Exact Sciences 32 (3):193-206.

View all 7 references / Add more references