Epistemic Supervenience and the Circle of Belief

The Monist 68 (1):90-104 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I shall begin with a series of quotations to illustrate how widespread are the views I wish to challenge

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

00269662

DOI

10.5840/monist198568115

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Epistemic Superoeruence and the Circle of Belief.James Van Cleve - 1983 - Journal of Philosophy 80 (9999):660-661.
Foundationalism and Epistemic Supervenience: A Study of the Foundationalist Theory of Epistemic Justification.Ill-Hwan Rim - 1988 - Dissertation, Brown University
Can the aim of belief ground epistemic normativity?Charles Côté-Bouchard - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (12):3181-3198.
How to Be an Epistemic Value Pluralist.David Matheson - 2011 - Dialogue 50 (2):391-405.
Review: Epistemic Supervenience Revisited. [REVIEW]James Van Cleve - 1999 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (4):1049 - 1055.
Understanding, Integration, and Epistemic Value.Georgi Gardiner - 2012 - Acta Analytica 27 (2):163-181.
Varieties of supervenience.Brian P. McLaughlin - 1995 - In Elias E. Savellos & U. Yalcin (eds.), Supervenience: New Essays. Cambridge University Press. pp. 16--59.
Charity, Supervenience, and Skepticism.Hamid Vahid - 2001 - Metaphilosophy 32 (3):308-325.
"Pure" versus "practical" epistemic justification.James A. Montmarquet - 2007 - Metaphilosophy 38 (1):71–87.
Global supervenience and belief.Franz Von Kutschera - 1994 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 23 (1):103-110.
Varieties of supervenience.Robert Stalnaker - 1996 - Philosophical Perspectives 10:221-42.
Foundationalism, epistemic principles, and the cartesian circle.James Van Cleve - 1979 - Philosophical Review 88 (1):55-91.
Various Concepts of “Supervenience” and Their Relations：A Comment on Kim’s Theory of Supervenience.Xiaoping Chen - 2011 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (2):316-333.
Epistemic Value and the New Evil Demon.B. J. C. Madison - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (1):89-107.
Epistemic Ought is a Commensurable Ought.Anthony Robert Booth - 2011 - European Journal of Philosophy 22 (4):529-539.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-21

Downloads
140 (#129,042)

6 months
12 (#203,353)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Van Cleve
University of Southern California

Citations of this work

Epistemology.Matthias Steup - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The myth of the myth of supervenience.David Mark Kovacs - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (8):1967-1989.
Naturalistic Epistemology and Reliabilism.Alvin I. Goldman - 1994 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 19 (1):301-320.
Internalist Reliabilism.Matthias Steup - 2004 - Philosophical Issues 14 (1):403-425.
Defining and defending nonconceptual contents and states.James Van Cleve - 2012 - Philosophical Perspectives 26 (1):411-430.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references