Don’t say that!

Argumentation 20 (4):495-510 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to pragma-dialectical methodology, a party in an argumentative discussion can be assumed to manoeuvre strategically between dialectical and rhetorical objectives. One confrontational form of strategic manoeuvring occurs when a critic charges an arguer with advancing a standpoint that has socially harmful consequences. In special situations this form of manoeuvring can be dialectically sound, for example when the standpoint is advanced in a way that damages the dialectical process. The boundary between fallacious and dialectically sound applications of this form of manoeuvring is examined by looking for the manoeuvring’s soundness conditions

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,931

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Confrontation and Ridicule.Jan Albert van Laar - 2008 - Informal Logic 28 (4):295-314.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
38 (#431,997)

6 months
7 (#491,855)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jan Albert Van Laar
University of Groningen

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation.Chaïm Perelman & Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca - 1969 - Notre Dame, IN, USA: Notre Dame University Press. Edited by Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca.
The new rhetoric: a treatise on argumentation.Chaïm Perelman - 1969 - Notre Dame, [Ind.]: University of Notre Dame Press. Edited by Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca.
The New Rhetoric.Charles Perelman & L. Olbrechts-Tyteca - 1957 - Philosophy Today 1 (1):4-10.
Communication and argument.Arne Naess - 1966 - [Totowa, N.J.]: Bedminster Press.

View all 12 references / Add more references