Deciding not to resuscitate in Dutch hospitals

Journal of Medical Ethics 19 (4):200-205 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The use of do not resuscitate (DNR) orders in Dutch hospitals was studied as part of a nationwide study on medical decisions concerning the end of life. DNR decisions are made in 6 per cent of all admissions, and 61 per cent of all in-hospital deaths were preceded by a DNR decision. We found that in only 14 per cent of the cases had the patients been involved in the DNR decision (32 per cent of competent patients). The concept of futility is analysed as these findings are discussed. We conclude that determining the effectiveness of resuscitation is a medical judgement whereas determining the proportionality (burden/benefit ratio) of it requires a discussion between doctor and patient (or his or her surrogates). Since the respondents in the cases without patient involvement gave many reasons for their decision that went beyond determining effectiveness, we conclude that more patient involvement would have been desirable

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Deciding not to resuscitate.R. Gillon - 1989 - Journal of Medical Ethics 15 (4):171-172.
“No Dr. Blue/Do Not Resuscitate”.Jane D. Hoyt - 1981 - Bioethics Quarterly 3 (2):128-132.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
43 (#351,093)

6 months
10 (#213,340)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile