Continuity in nature and in mathematics: Boltzmann and Poincaré

Synthese 192 (10):3275-3295 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The development of rigorous foundations of differential calculus in the course of the nineteenth century led to concerns among physicists about its applicability in physics. Through this development, differential calculus was made independent of empirical and intuitive notions of continuity, and based instead on strictly mathematical conditions of continuity. However, for Boltzmann and Poincaré, the applicability of mathematics in physics depended on whether there is a basis in physics, intuition or experience for the fundamental axioms of mathematics—and this meant that to determine the status of differential equations in physics, they had to consider whether there was a justification for these mathematical continuity conditions in physics. For this reason, their ideas about continuity and discreteness in nature were entangled with epistemology and philosophy of mathematics. They reached opposite conclusions: Poincaré argued that physicists must work with a continuous representation of nature, and thus with differential equations, while Boltzmann argued that physicists must ultimately take nature to be discrete.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,623

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the origins and foundations of Laplacian determinism.Marij van Strien - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 45:24-31.
Boltzmann et Vlasov.Roger Godard - 2018 - In Amy Ackerberg-Hastings, Marion W. Alexander, Zoe Ashton, Christopher Baltus, Phil Bériault, Daniel J. Curtin, Eamon Darnell, Craig Fraser, Roger Godard, William W. Hackborn, Duncan J. Melville, Valérie Lynn Therrien, Aaron Thomas-Bolduc & R. S. D. Thomas (eds.), Research in History and Philosophy of Mathematics: The Cshpm 2017 Annual Meeting in Toronto, Ontario. Springer Verlag. pp. 157-166.
Natural Discrete Differential Calculus in Physics.Carlo Rovelli - 2019 - Foundations of Physics 49 (7):693-699.
Schizo‐Math.Simon Duffy - 2004 - Angelaki 9 (3):199 – 215.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-26

Downloads
52 (#303,180)

6 months
5 (#883,144)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marij Van Strien
Radboud University

References found in this work

Reconsidering Logical Positivism.Michael Friedman - 1999 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wandering Significance: An Essay on Conceptual Behavior.Mark Wilson - 2006 - Oxford, GB: Oxford: Clarendon Press.
The value of science.Henri Poincaré - 1907 - New York,: Dover Publications. Edited by George Bruce Halsted.
Science and method.Henri Poincaré - 1914 - Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications. Edited by Francis Maitland.
Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times.M. Kline - 1978 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (1):68-87.

View all 16 references / Add more references