Confrontation and Ridicule

Informal Logic 28 (4):295-314 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ridicule can be used in order to create concurrence as well as to en-hance antagonism. This paper deals with ridicule that is used by a critic when he is responding to a standpoint or to a reason advanced in support of a standpoint. Ridicule profits from humor’s good repu-tation, and correctly so, even when it is used in argumentative contexts. However, ridicule can be harmful to a discussion. This paper will deal with ridicule from the perspective of strategic maneuvering between the individual rhetorical objec-tive of effecting persuasion and the shared dialectical objective of resolving the dispute on its merits. In what ways can ridicule be used in strategic maneuvering and under what conditions are these uses dialectically sound?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reid on ridicule and common sense.Giovanni B. Grandi - 2008 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 6 (1):71-90.
Don’t say that!J. A. van Laar - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (4):495-510.
Strategic Maneuvering with Dissociation.M. A. van Rees - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (4):473-487.
An Essay on Eden.Hud Hudson - 2010 - Faith and Philosophy 27 (3):273-286.
Lucretian Ridicule of Anaxagoras.Robert D. Brown - 1983 - Classical Quarterly 33 (01):146-.
Incest and ridicule in the Poenulus of Plautus.George F. Franko - 1995 - Classical Quarterly 45 (01):250-.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
30 (#535,245)

6 months
12 (#218,039)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jan Albert Van Laar
University of Groningen

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Fallacies.Charles Leonard Hamblin - 1970 - Newport News, Va.: Vale Press.
The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation.Chaïm Perelman & Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca - 1969 - Notre Dame, IN, USA: Notre Dame University Press. Edited by Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca.
Fallacies.C. L. Hamblin - 1970 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 160:492-492.
Attitudes toward history.Kenneth Burke - 1937 - Berkeley: University of California Press.

View all 11 references / Add more references