Co-designing algorithms for governance: Ensuring responsible and accountable algorithmic management of refugee camp supplies

Big Data and Society 9 (1) (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is increasing criticism on the use of big data and algorithms in public governance. Studies revealed that algorithms may reinforce existing biases and defy scrutiny by public officials using them and citizens subject to algorithmic decisions and services. In response, scholars have called for more algorithmic transparency and regulation. These are useful, but ex post solutions in which the development of algorithms remains a rather autonomous process. This paper argues that co-design of algorithms with relevant stakeholders from government and society is another means to achieve responsible and accountable algorithms that is largely overlooked in the literature. We present a case study of the development of an algorithmic tool to estimate the populations of refugee camps to manage the delivery of emergency supplies. This case study demonstrates how in different stages of development of the tool—data selection and pre-processing, training of the algorithm and post-processing and adoption—inclusion of knowledge from the field led to changes to the algorithm. Co-design supported responsibility of the algorithm in the selection of big data sources and in preventing reinforcement of biases. It contributed to accountability of the algorithm by making the estimations transparent and explicable to its users. They were able to use the tool for fitting purposes and used their discretion in the interpretation of the results. It is yet unclear whether this eventually led to better servicing of refugee camps.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethical Implications and Accountability of Algorithms.Kirsten Martin - 2018 - Journal of Business Ethics 160 (4):835-850.
Algorithms and Posthuman Governance.James Hughes - 2017 - Journal of Posthuman Studies.
Society-in-the-loop: programming the algorithmic social contract.Iyad Rahwan - 2018 - Ethics and Information Technology 20 (1):5-14.
Accountable Capitalism, Responsible Capitalism, and Political Capitalism.Duane Windsor - 2019 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 30:12-25.
Democratizing Algorithmic Fairness.Pak-Hang Wong - 2020 - Philosophy and Technology 33 (2):225-244.
Algorithmic Accountability and Public Reason.Reuben Binns - 2018 - Philosophy and Technology 31 (4):543-556.
Biased Humans, (Un)Biased Algorithms?Florian Pethig & Julia Kroenung - 2022 - Journal of Business Ethics 183 (3):637-652.
On logic of complex algorithms.Helena Rasiowa - 1981 - Studia Logica 40 (3):289 - 310.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-07-02

Downloads
7 (#1,356,784)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?