Authors
Marij Van Strien
Bergische Universität Wuppertal
Abstract
When David Bohm published his alternative theory of quantum mechanics in 1952, it was not received well; a recurring criticism was that it formed a reactionary attempt to return to classical physics. In response, Bohm emphasized the progressiveness of his approach, and even turned the accusation of classicality around by arguing that he wanted to move beyond classical elements still inherent in orthodox quantum mechanics. In later years, he moved more and more towards speculative and mystical directions. This paper aims to explain this discrepancy between the ways in which Bohm’s work on quantum mechanics has been received and the way in which Bohm himself presented it. I reject the idea that Bohm’s early work can be described as mechanist, determinist, and realist, in contrast to his later writings, and argue that there is in fact a strong continuity between his work on quantum mechanics from the early 1950s and his later, more speculative writings. In particular, I argue that Bohm was never strongly committed to determinism and was a realist in some ways but not in others. A closer look at Bohm’s philosophical commitments highlights the ways in which his theory of quantum mechanics is non-classical and does not offer a way to avoid all ‘quantum weirdness’.
Keywords David Bohm  Bohmian mechanics  Interpretations of quantum mechanics  Classicality  Scientific realism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.shpsb.2020.04.005
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,226
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Understanding physics: ‘What?’, ‘Why?’, and ‘How?’.Mario Hubert - 2021 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (3):1-36.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Probability Zero in Bohm’s Theory.Meir Hemmo & Orly Shenker - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (5):1148-1158.
Arrow of Time in Rigged Hilbert Space Quantum Mechanics.Robert C. Bishop - 2004 - International Journal of Theoretical Physics 43 (7):1675–1687.
The Quantum Mechanics of Minds and Worlds.Lon Becker - 2001 - Philosophical Review 110 (3):482-484.
The Quantum Mechanics of Minds and Worlds.Lon Becker - 2001 - Philosophical Review 110 (3):482.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-05-14

Total views
14 ( #729,270 of 2,499,739 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,066 of 2,499,739 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes