A response to the mohist arguments in "impartial caring"

In Kim Chong Chong, Sor-Hoon Tan & C. L. Ten (eds.), The Moral Circle and the Self: Chinese and Western Approaches. Open Court (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Review: A Response to Card, Hoagland, Houston. [REVIEW]Nel Noddings - 1990 - Hypatia 5 (1):120 - 126.
More Mohist Marginalia: A Reply to Makeham on Later Mohist Canon and Explanation B 67.Chris Fraser - 2007 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy and Culture 2:227–59.
Mohist Care.Dan Robins - 2012 - Philosophy East and West 62 (1):60-91.
Is Fishkins’s Critique of Impartial Consequentialism Impartial?Michael H. Robins - 1985 - Tulane Studies in Philosophy 33:21-26.
Existentialist Voluntarism as a Source of Normativity.Andrew Jason Cohen - 2008 - Philosophical Papers 37 (1):89-129.
A Comment on Fry's "The Role of Caring in a Theory of Nursing Ethics".Jeannine Ross Boyer & James Lindemann Nelson - 1990 - Hypatia 5 (3):153-158.
When is Impartiality Morally Appropriate?Brad Hooker - 2010 - In Brian Feltham & John Cottingham (eds.), Partiality and Impartiality: Morality, Special Relationships, and the Wider World. Oxford University Press. pp. 26-41.
Mohist canons.Chris Fraser - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
324 (#59,218)

6 months
65 (#64,578)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bryan Van Norden
Yale-NUS College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references