A Preferred Treatment of Mill's Methods: Some Misinterpretations by Modern Textbooks

Informal Logic 20 (1):19-42 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A number of modern logic books give a misrepresentation of Mill's Methods as originally conceived by Mill. In this paper, I point out what I believe is a better presentation of Mill's Methods. This treatment is not only historically more accurate, but it also represents a better conceptual introduction to Mill's Methods in general

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Philosophy of Scientific Method.John Stuart Mill - 1950 - New York, NY, USA: Dover Publications.
Rights, welfare, and Mill's moral theory.David Lyons - 1994 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Autonomy, slavery, and mill's critique of paternalism.Alan E. Fuchs - 2001 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (3):231-251.
Thematic Affinities and Psychoanalysis.Edward Erwin - 2012 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 19 (3):217-219.
Interpreting mill's qualitative hedonism.Jonathan Riley - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (212):410–418.
Agency, properties and causation.Helen Steward - 2011 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (3):390-401.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-04

Downloads
64 (#248,320)

6 months
21 (#122,285)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references