The idea of justice * by Amartya Sen

Analysis 71 (1):204-207 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

(No abstract is available for this citation)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/analys/anq064

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Amartya Sen, The Idea of Justice (London: Allen Lane, 2009), pp. xxviii + 468.James Connelly - 2012 - Utilitas 24 (1):144-149.
Identity, community, and justice: Locating Amartya Sen's work on identity.Mozaffar Qizilbash - 2009 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (3):251-266.
Amartya Sen: The idea of justice.Onora O'Neill - 2010 - Journal of Philosophy 107 (7):384-388.
Comment on Wilfried Hinsch: Ideal Justice and Rational Dissent: A Critique of Amartya Sen's Idea of Justice.Mathias Thaler - 2011 - Analyse & Kritik 33 (2):387–393.
Symposium on Amartya Sen's philosophy: 1 capability and freedom: A defence of Sen.Philip Pettit - 2001 - Economics and Philosophy 17 (1):1-20.
Comparative Assessments of Justice, Political Feasibility, and Ideal Theory.Pablo Gilabert - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (1):39-56.
Sen and the Bhagavad Gita: Lessons for a Theory of Justice.Joshua Anderson - 2012 - Asian Philosophy 22 (1):63-74.
Against Sen Against Rawls On Justice.Evan Riley - 2011 - Indian Journal of Human Development 5 (1):211-221.
The idea of justice.Amartya Sen - 2009 - Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-11

Downloads
115 (#149,590)

6 months
1 (#1,444,594)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Vallentyne
University of Missouri, Columbia

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Debate: Capabilities versus opportunities for well-being.Peter Vallentyne - 2005 - Journal of Political Philosophy 13 (3):359–371.

Add more references