Coercion and Justice

American Political Science Review 105 (1):205-220 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, I develop a new account of the liberal view that principles of justice are meant to justify state coercion, and consider its implications for the question of global socioeconomic justice. Although contemporary proponents of this view deny that principles of socioeconomic justice apply globally, on my newly developed account this conclusion is mistaken. I distinguish between two types of coercion, systemic and interactional, and argue that a plausible theory of global justice should contain principles justifying both. The justification of interactional coercion requires principles regulating interstate interference; that of systemic coercion requires principles of global socioeconomic justice. I argue that the proposed view not only helps us make progress in the debate on global justice, but also offers an independently compelling and systematic account of the function and conditions of applicability of justice. -/-

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Justice, Authority, and the World Order.A. Walton - 2009 - Journal of Global Ethics 5 (3):215 – 230.
Global Justice, Global Institutions.Daniel M. Weinstock (ed.) - 2007 - University of Calgary Press.
Equality, Coercion, Culture and Social Norms.Richard J. Arneson - 2003 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 2 (2):139-163.
Principles or Imagination? Two Approaches to Global Justice.Mark Coeckelbergh - 2007 - Journal of Global Ethics 3 (2):203 – 221.
Reconceptualizing Human Rights.Marcus Arvan - 2012 - Journal of Global Ethics 8 (1):91-105.
Global Health Justice and Governance.Jennifer Prah Ruger - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (12):35-54.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-25

Downloads
360 (#30,845)

6 months
41 (#25,682)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?