Byrne and Hall on Everett and Chalmers

Abstract

It is argued that the criticism of Byrne and Hall of the argument of Chalmers in favor of the Everett-style interpretation is incorrect.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Everett and Wheeler, the Untold Story.Peter Byrne - 2010 - In Simon Saunders, Jonathan Barrett, Adrian Kent & David Wallace (eds.), Many Worlds?: Everett, Quantum Theory & Reality. Oxford University Press.
Book Review:Liberty. Everett Dean Martin. [REVIEW]Everett W. Hall - 1931 - International Journal of Ethics 41 (3):381-.
Chalmers on consciousness and quantum mechanics.Alex Byrne & Ned Hall - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (3):370-90.
Hall's Analysis of "Ought.".Romane Clark - 1959 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 24 (3):265-266.
New books. [REVIEW]Everett W. Hall - 1955 - Mind 64 (253):139-141.
Focalized Identity.Everett W. Hall - 1933 - The Monist 43 (2):203-219.
Further words on 'ought'.Everett W. Hall - 1956 - Philosophical Studies 7 (5):74 - 78.
Continuity and Identity.Everett W. Hall - 1932 - The Monist 42 (4):533-563.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-07

Downloads
22 (#692,982)

6 months
5 (#638,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lev Vaidman
Tel Aviv University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references