Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 6 (1):67-116 (2010)
AbstractThe Semantic-Pragmatic Analysis of Persian Modal Verbs Based on Papafragou's Model This paper aims at analyzing the semantics and pragmatics of Persian modal verbs based on Papafragou's relevance-theoretic model. Persian modals are defined in terms of logical relations and propositional domains. According to the findings of the research, two of the three modals, namely, šodan and tavân express the logical relation of compatibility with respect to different propositional domains: the three forms mišavad, mišod and mišode are unspecified with respect to their propositional domains and take them directly from the context, whereas betavân and bešavad accept the desirability domain. Mitavân also expresses compatibility in relation to the propositions in the factual domain. However, bˇyad is the only modal that encodes the logical relation of entailment and is unspecified with respect to the type of propositional domain it accepts.
Similar books and articles
The acquisition of modality: Implications for theories of semantic representation.Anna Papafragou - 1998 - Mind and Language 13 (3):370–399.
Cognitive Products and the Semantics of Attitude Verbs and Deontic Modals.Friederike Moltmann - 2017 - In Friederike Moltmann & Mark Textor (eds.), Act-Based Conceptions of Propositional Content. Contemporary and Historical Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 254-289.
On the semantic and pragmatic polyfunctionality of modal verbs.Johan Van der Auwera - 1999 - In Ken Turner (ed.), The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface From Different Points of View. Elsevier.
Time and modality without tenses or modals.Maria Bittner - 2011 - In Renate Musan & Monika Rathert (eds.), Tense across Languages. Niemeyer. pp. 147--188.
Nominalizations: The Case of Nominalizations of Modal Predicates.Friederike Moltmann - forthcoming - In Lisa Matthewson, Cécile Meier, Hotze Rullman, Thomas Ede Zimmermann & Daniel Gutzmann (eds.), Blackwell Companion to Semantics. Wiley.
A philosophical conception of propositional modal logic.Edward N. Zalta - 1993 - Philosophical Topics 21 (2):263-281.
In Defense of the Modal Account of the Progressive.Ivan Mayerhofer - 2014 - Mind and Language 29 (1):85-108.
Modality and Propositional Attitudes.Michael Hegarty - 2015 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Phrasal Verbs And Progressive Aspect.Jagoda Topalov - 2008 - Facta Universitatis, Series: Linguistics and Literature 6 (1):61-71.
Variants of multi-relational semantics for propositional non-normal modal logics.Erica Calardo & Antonino Rotolo - 2014 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 24 (4):293-320.
Identity in modal logic theorem proving.Francis J. Pelletier - 1993 - Studia Logica 52 (2):291 - 308.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Relevance.D. Sperber & Deirdre Wilson - 1986 - Communication and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Journal 2.
G. H. von Wright. Interpretations of modal logic. Mind, n.s. vol. 61 , pp. 165–177. [REVIEW]Alan Ross Anderson - 1953 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 18 (2):176-177.