Models of second-order zermelo set theory

Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 5 (3):289-302 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In [12], Ernst Zermelo described a succession of models for the axioms of set theory as initial segments of a cumulative hierarchy of levelsUαVα. The recursive definition of theVα's is:Thus, a little reflection on the axioms of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory shows thatVω, the first transfinite level of the hierarchy, is a model of all the axioms ofZFwith the exception of the axiom of infinity. And, in general, one finds that ifκis a strongly inaccessible ordinal, thenVκis a model of all of the axioms ofZF. Doubtless, when cast as a first-order theory,ZFdoes not characterize the structures 〈Vκ,∈∩〉 forκa strongly inaccessible ordinal, by the Löwenheim-Skolem theorem. Still, one of the main achievements of [12] consisted in establishing that a characterization of these models can be attained when one ventures into second-order logic. For let second-orderZFbe, as usual, the theory that results fromZFwhen the axiom schema of replacement is replaced by its second-order universal closure. Then, it is a remarkable result due to Zermelo that second-orderZFcan only be satisfied in models of the form 〈Vκ,∈∩〉 forκa strongly inaccessible ordinal.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Second order logic or set theory?Jouko Väänänen - 2012 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 18 (1):91-121.
Slim models of zermelo set theory.A. R. D. Mathias - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (2):487-496.
The origins of zermelo's axiomatization of set theory.Gregory H. Moore - 1978 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 7 (1):307 - 329.
Categoricity theorems and conceptions of set.Gabriel Uzquiano - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (2):181-196.
Leibnizian models of set theory.Ali Enayat - 2004 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 69 (3):775-789.
Is any set theory true?Joseph S. Ullian - 1969 - Philosophy of Science 36 (3):271-279.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
130 (#137,233)

6 months
19 (#129,880)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gabriel Uzquiano
University of Southern California

Citations of this work

The Iterative Conception of Set: a (Bi-)Modal Axiomatisation.J. P. Studd - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (5):1-29.
Modal structuralism and reflection.Sam Roberts - 2019 - Review of Symbolic Logic 12 (4):823-860.
Iteration one more time.Roy T. Cook - 2003 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 44 (2):63--92.
Plurals.Agustín Rayo - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 2 (3):411–427.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Foundations of Set Theory.J. R. Shoenfield - 1964 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 29 (3):141-141.
Set Theory. An Introduction to Large Cardinals.Azriel Levy - 1978 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 43 (2):384-384.
A system of axiomatic set theory - Part VII.Paul Bernays - 1954 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 19 (2):81-96.
A system of axiomatic set theory—Part VI.Paul Bernays - 1948 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 13 (2):65-79.

Add more references