Bioethics 36 (2):143-153 (2022)

Authors
Cristian Timmermann
Universität Augsburg
Abstract
Recent years have witnessed intensive efforts to specify which requirements ethical artificial intelligence (AI) must meet. General guidelines for ethical AI consider a varying number of principles important. A frequent novel element in these guidelines, that we have bundled together under the term explicability, aims to reduce the black-box character of machine learning algorithms. The centrality of this element invites reflection on the conceptual relation between explicability and the four bioethical principles. This is important because the application of general ethical frameworks to clinical decision-making entails conceptual questions: Is explicability a free-standing principle? Is it already covered by the well-established four bioethical principles? Or is it an independent value that needs to be recognized as such in medical practice? We discuss these questions in a conceptual-ethical analysis, which builds upon the findings of an empirical document analysis. On the example of the medical specialty of radiology, we analyze the position of radiological associations on the ethical use of medical AI. We address three questions: Are there references to explicability or a similar concept? What are the reasons for such inclusion? Which ethical concepts are referred to?
Keywords black box  explainability  machine learning  medical ethics  principlism  transparency
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2022
DOI 10.1111/bioe.12918
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,163
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Ethical Machines?Ariela Tubert - 2018 - Seattle University Law Review 41 (4).
What is Interpretability?Adrian Erasmus, Tyler D. P. Brunet & Eyal Fisher - 2021 - Philosophy and Technology 34:833–862.
Philosophy and Machine Learning.Paul Thagard - 1990 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20 (2):261-76.
Machine Ethics.Michael Anderson & Susan Leigh Anderson (eds.) - 2011 - Cambridge Univ. Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-07-14

Total views
26 ( #439,033 of 2,506,525 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #119,087 of 2,506,525 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes