Anderson and Belnap’s Invitation to Sin

Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (4):453 - 472 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Quine has argued that modal logic began with the sin of confusing use and mention. Anderson and Belnap, on the other hand, have offered us a way out through a strategy of nominahzation. This paper reviews the history of Lewis's early work in modal logic, and then proves some results about the system in which "A is necessary" is intepreted as "A is a classical tautology."

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-06-12

Downloads
93 (#181,115)

6 months
5 (#638,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alasdair Urquhart
University of Toronto, St. George Campus

Citations of this work

A Lewisian Semantics for S2.Edwin Mares - 2013 - History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (1):53-67.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The ways of paradox, and other essays.Willard Van Orman Quine (ed.) - 1976 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Symbolic logic.Clarence Irving Lewis - 1932 - [New York]: Dover Publications. Edited by Cooper Harold Langford.
The Logic of Provability.George Boolos - 1993 - Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Symbolic Logic.C. I. Lewis & C. H. Langford - 1932 - Erkenntnis 4 (1):65-66.
A Survey of Symbolic Logic.C. I. Lewis - 1918 - Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 17 (3):78-79.

View all 29 references / Add more references