The Rule of Non‐Opposition: Opening Up Decision‐Making by Consensus

Journal of Political Philosophy 22 (3):320-341 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The objective of this article is to propose a precise characterization of the collective practice behind at least an important part of the phenomena named “decision by consensus”. First, I provide descriptions of the use of this rule, and give a definition of the non-opposition rule, both as a specific sequence of acts and as a stopping rule. Second, I challenge the usual way of understanding the non-opposition rule by contrast with voting, stating that the contrast between logic of approval and logic of consent also has to be taken into account. Third, I examine the conditions of its use. The non-opposition rule satisfies groups whose concern is to decide without dividing. Finally, from the analytic benefit of opening up decision by consensus as the use of the non-opposition rule, I will examine, in a fourth part, whether consensus in decision-making is as democratic a procedure as is sometimes thought.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Ethical Action Principle in Decision-Making.Kumiko Yoshitake - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 5:75-83.
Shared decision-making, gender and new technologies.Kristin Zeiler - 2007 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 10 (3):279-287.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-14

Downloads
27 (#506,960)

6 months
2 (#670,035)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?