Philosophy Today 62 (2):419-446 (2018)

Authors
Abstract
In 1967, Hannah Arendt published an essay with the deceptively simple title “Truth and Politics”. Most scholarly discussions of her essay consider her distinction between a traditional political art of limited, deliberate, strategic lying and modern, organised, global lying and self-deception and then evaluate her qualified defence of the virtues of mendacity. This article suggests, however, that her essay has a much broader ambit: viz., to defend the political value of truth-telling. The main purpose of this article is to demonstrate that she formulates her essay as an apology of the truth-teller in politics and of her own truth-telling in her controversial report of the Eichmann trial. It first surveys the personal motives of Arendt’s political defence of frank speech. It shows that in developing this defence she significantly revises her scepticism about the value of truth-telling in politics. She does so by identifying three different types of truth-teller with distinctive political roles: philosophers who exemplify the truth in their own lives, citizens who see the world from other people’s perspectives, and poets and historians whose stories reconcile citizens to the past. Finally, it argues that the tragic political perspective Arendt sought to revive requires acknowledging value of the emotions in making political judgments.
Keywords Catholic Tradition  Contemporary Philosophy  Continental Philosophy
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0031-8256
DOI 10.5840/philtoday201866219
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,259
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Beyond the Ideal Political Apology.Alice MacLachlan - 2014 - In Mihaela Mihai & Mathias Thaler (eds.), On the Uses and Abuses of Political Apologies. Palgrave MacMillan.
Arendt’s Apology in Advance.Michael Ure - forthcoming - Philosophy Today.
Apology: A Small Yet Important Part of Justice.Jean-Marc Coicaud - 2009 - Japanese Journal of Political Science 10 (1):93-124.
The Historicity of Plato's Apology.W. Prior - 2001 - Polis 18 (1-2):41-57.
The Apology: The Beginning of Plato's Own Philosophy.Shinro Kato - 1991 - Classical Quarterly 41 (2):356-364.
The Apology: The Beginning of Plato's Own Philosophy.Shinro Kato - 1991 - Classical Quarterly 41 (02):356-.
Should There Be an Apology for American Slavery?George Schedler - 2007 - Should There Be an Apology for American Slavery? 21 (2):125-148.
Apology.Natasa Gasia - forthcoming - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Apology.Mihaela Mihai - 2013 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-09-07

Total views
15 ( #700,725 of 2,518,492 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,186 of 2,518,492 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes