Using political sanctions to discourage intergroup attacks: Social identity and authority legitimacy

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 42:e143 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

De Dreu and Gross offer novel solutions to discouraging attackers via political sanctions. We offer insights from social psychological and criminological research on when such sanctions would work and when they could backfire. We argue that the influence of such sanctioning ultimately rests upon the extent to which such authorities can claim to represent the society that they serve.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Legitimacy is Not Authority.Jon Garthoff - 2010 - Law and Philosophy 29 (6):669-694.
Sanctioning Liberal Democracies.Avia Pasternak - 2009 - Political Studies 57:54-74.
Social Meaning, Compliance Conditions, and Law's Claim to Authority.William Edmundson - 2002 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 15 (1):51-67.
Political legitimacy.Fabienne Peter - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Justice, Legitimacy, and (Normative) Authority for Political Realists.Enzo Rossi - 2012 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (2):149-164.
Strategic coordination and the law.Nicholas Almendares & Dimitri Landa - 2007 - Law and Philosophy 26 (5):501-529.
The Logic and the Epistemological Sanctions of Dr. Johnson's Arguments.Agnes Charlene Senape McDermott - 1988 - Dissertation, The University of Manchester (United Kingdom)

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-08-14

Downloads
3 (#1,644,941)

6 months
2 (#1,136,865)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references