Southwest Philosophy Review 25 (2):113-147 (2009)

Joseph Urbas
Université Bordeaux Montaigne
Two things have been missing from discussions of Emerson and skepticism. The first—and the most glaring omission, given his precise, unambiguous definition of skepticism as “unbelief in cause and effect” (“Worship”)—is Emerson’s causationism. The second is his view of skepticism as organically related to a wide array of other forms of anti-realism or “romance.” Only the first can explain the second and thereby give us a better sense of how Emerson’s specific response to skepticism as a philosophical problem fits into his broader, resolutely realist vision of the conduct of life.
Keywords Emerson and Skepticism  Emerson's Metaphysics  Emerson and Cavell
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0897-2346
DOI 10.5840/swphilreview200925241
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

How Close a Reader of Emerson Is Stanley Cavell?Urbas Joseph - 2017 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 31 (4):557-574.
Cavell’s “Moral Perfectionism” or Emerson’s “Moral Sentiment”?Joseph Urbas - 2010 - European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 2 (2):41-53.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
224 ( #51,139 of 2,518,088 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #46,156 of 2,518,088 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes