How to argue for the value of humanity

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (1):96-125 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, March 2006. Significant effort has been devoted to locating a good argument for Kant ’s Formula of Humanity. In this paper, I contrast two arguments, based on Kant ’s text, for the Formula of Humanity. The first, which I call the “Valued Ends” argument, is an influential and appealing argument developed most notably by Christine Korsgaard and Allen Wood. Notwithstanding the appeal and influence of this argument, it ultimately fails on several counts. I therefore present as an alternative the “Autonomy” argument, which is largely inspired by the failings of the Valued Ends argument.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
158 (#117,536)

6 months
8 (#347,798)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Adrienne Martin
Claremont McKenna College

Citations of this work

Kant's formula of the end in itself: Some recent debates.Lara Denis - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 2 (2):244–257.
Kant on Despondent Moral Failure.Kate Moran - 2023 - Kantian Review 28 (1):125-141.
Why Moral Status Matters for Metaethics.Caroline T. Arruda - 2018 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 4 (4):471-490.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references