- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
A model of Cummings and Foreman revisited
Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 165 (12):1813-1831 (2014)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Review of J. Cummings, A Model in Which GCH Holds at Successors but Fails at Limits; Strong Ultrapowers and Long Core Models; Coherent Sequences Versus Radin Sequences; and J. Cummings, M. Foreman, and M. Magidor, Squares, Scales and Stationary Reflection. [REVIEW]Arthur W. Apter - 2002 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (4):550-552.
A Model in Which GCH Holds at Successors but Fails at Limits.James Cummings, Matthew Foreman & Menachem Magidor - 2002 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (4):550-552.
Diagonal Prikry extensions.James Cummings & Matthew Foreman - 2010 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 75 (4):1383-1402.
The non-compactness of square.James Cummings, Matthew Foreman & Menachem Magidor - 2003 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (2):637-643.
Aronszajn Trees on N 2 and N 3.Uri Abraham, James Cummings, Matthew Foreman, Menachem Magidor & Saharon Shelah - 2001 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 7 (2):283-285.
Canonical structure in the universe of set theory: Part two.James Cummings, Matthew Foreman & Menachem Magidor - 2006 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 142 (1):55-75.
A model in which every Boolean algebra has many subalgebras.James Cummings & Saharon Shelah - 1995 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (3):992-1004.
Review: Uri Abraham, Aronszajn Trees on $mathscr{N}2$ and $mathscr{N}3$; James Cummings, Matthew Foreman, The Tree Property; Menachem Magidor, Saharon Shelah, The Tree Property at Successors of Singular Cardinals. [REVIEW]Arthur W. Apter - 2001 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 7 (2):283-285.
A Descriptive View of Ergodic Theory.Matthew Foreman, M. Foreman, A. S. Kechris, A. Louveau, B. Weiss & Alexander S. Kechris - 2001 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 7 (4):545-546.
Review: Moti Gitik, Menachem Magidor, The Singular Cardinal Hypothesis Revisited. [REVIEW]James Cummings - 1995 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (1):339-340.
On a problem of Foreman and Magidor.Arthur W. Apter - 2005 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 44 (4):493-498.
Review: Matthew Foreman, M. Foreman, A. S. Kechris, A. Louveau, B. Weiss, A Descriptive View of Ergodic Theory; Alexander S. Kechris, Descriptive Dynamics. [REVIEW]Greg Hjorth - 2001 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 7 (4):545-546.
A model of neutron star dynamics.F. W. Cummings - 1993 - In E. T. Jaynes, Walter T. Grandy & Peter W. Milonni (eds.), Physics and Probability: Essays in Honor of Edwin T. Jaynes. Cambridge University Press. pp. 137.
Matthew Foreman. A descriptive view of ergodic theory. Descriptive set theory and dynamical systems, edited by M. Foreman, A. S. Kechris, A. Louveau, and B. Weiss, London Mathematical Society lecture note series, no. 277, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, etc., 2000, pp. 87–171. [REVIEW]Greg Hjorth - 2001 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 7 (4):545-546.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-08-28
Downloads
19 (#753,814)
6 months
11 (#196,102)
2015-08-28
Downloads
19 (#753,814)
6 months
11 (#196,102)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Fragility and indestructibility II.Spencer Unger - 2015 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 166 (11):1110-1122.
Guessing models and the approachability ideal.Rahman Mohammadpour & Boban Veličković - 2020 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 21 (2):2150003.
Itp, isp, and sch.Sherwood Hachtman & Dima Sinapova - 2019 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 84 (2):713-725.
The strong tree property and weak square.Yair Hayut & Spencer Unger - 2017 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 63 (1-2):150-154.
The Strong and Super Tree Properties at Successors of Singular Cardinals.William Adkisson - forthcoming - Journal of Symbolic Logic.
References found in this work
Squares, scales and stationary reflection.James Cummings, Matthew Foreman & Menachem Magidor - 2001 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 1 (01):35-98.
Aronszajn trees and the independence of the transfer property.William Mitchell - 1972 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 5 (1):21.
Scales, squares and reflection.James Cummings, Matthew Foreman & Menachem Magidor - 2001 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 1 (1):35-98.
Reflecting stationary sets and successors of singular cardinals.Saharon Shelah - 1991 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 31 (1):25-53.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-hc2g5 uwo