Dissertation, University of Edinburgh (2018)

Authors
Steven Umbrello
Delft University of Technology
Abstract
Safe-by-Design (SBD) frameworks for the development of emerging technologies have become an ever more popular means by which scholars argue that transformative emerging technologies can safely incorporate human values. One such popular SBD methodology is called Value Sensitive Design (VSD). A central tenet of this design methodology is to investigate stakeholder values and design those values into technologies during early stage research and development (R&D). To accomplish this, the VSD framework mandates that designers consult the philosophical and ethical literature to best determine how to weigh moral trade-offs. However, the VSD framework also concedes the universalism of moral values, particularly the values of freedom, autonomy, equality trust and privacy justice. This paper argues that the VSD methodology, particularly applied to nano-bio-info-cogno (NBIC) technologies, has an insufficient grounding for the determination of moral values. As such, an exploration of the value-investigations of VSD are deconstructed to illustrate both its strengths and weaknesses. This paper also provides possible modalities for the strengthening of the VSD methodology, particularly through the application of moral imagination and how moral imagination exceed the boundaries of moral intuitions in the development of novel technologies.
Keywords value sensitive design  safe-by-design  design psychology  moral imagination  moral psychology
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Reason, Truth and History.Hilary Putnam - 1981 - Cambridge University Press.
Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity.Richard Rorty - 1989 - Cambridge University Press.
Reason, Truth and History.Hilary Putnam - 1981 - Cambridge University Press.
Art as Experience.John Dewey - 1934 - G. Allen & Unwin.

View all 48 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Regulation or Responsibility?Mark Coeckelbergh - 2006 - Science, Technology and Human Values 31 (3):237-260.
Moral Machines.Jos De Mul - 2010 - Techne 14 (3):226-236.
Designing Robots for Care: Care Centered Value-Sensitive Design.Aimee van Wynsberghe - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):407-433.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-06-13

Total views
323 ( #29,703 of 2,462,324 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
46 ( #19,211 of 2,462,324 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes