The Critique of Gender Linguistics from the Perspective of Feminist Linguistics

Дискурс 7 (2):135-155 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Introduction. The paper reviews features and main problems of feminist linguistics. The novelty of the study is an unparalleled take on feminist linguistics in contradistinction to gender linguistics; the identification of their fundamental differences as well as emphasizing arguments in favour of both scholarly importance and practical value of feminist linguistic studies. The relevance of the study is conditioned by the lack of academic papers concerning the subject; the growing interest in studying the language as an anthropocentric sociocultural phenomenon; and the increasing significance of the feminist movement world-wide.Methodology and data sources. The theoretical foundation of the study constitutes Russian and foreign gender studies (works of А. V. Kirilina, А. М. Kuznetsov), feminist sociological and sociolinguistic studies (L. N. Kaznin, R. Lakoff, M. Fuko) as well as feminist linguistic studies (N. A. Antropova, E. Gorshko, O. A. Voronina, E. Zdravomyslova, A. V. Tolstokorova). The methods of the study include both analysis and synthesis of theoretical material; polling research; the analysis of the collected data.Results and discussion. The latest results on feminist linguistics research are showing inadequacy of the attempts of proving the existence of either «women’s language», «men’s language», or genderlect. This is in fact entirely sociocultural phenomenon of the replicating women’s and men’s behavioral patterns in a particular culture, including the patterns of speech. Feminist linguistics uses a more in-depth approach in the studies and addresses the language system directly, identifying gender asymmetry that is evident in the androcentrism of a language; it also develops strategies against language sexism and suggests concrete ways of its elimination, such as the introduction of gender-neutral lexical units and feminine gender-specific job titles, the implementation of inclusive language. All of that is possible with feminist language reforms and appropriate feminist language planning.Conclusion. An overview of conventional gender linguistics findings draws to a conclusion that feminist linguistic studies introduce lots of new ideas of a special value to linguistics. Feminist language critique is a progressive course of modern linguistics that draws attention to the most vital language issues of the society and suggests effective means of addressing them.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A critique of the minimalist program.David Johnson & Shalom Lappin - 1997 - Linguistics and Philosophy 20 (3):273-333.
Postmodern (applied) linguistics.Martin Stegu - 2011 - Semiotica 2011 (183):343-357.
Usage-based linguistics and the magic number four.Clarence Green - 2017 - Cognitive Linguistics 28 (2):209-237.
Rethinking linguistics.Hayley G. Davis - 2003 - New York: RoutledgeCurzon. Edited by Talbot J. Taylor.
On linguistics in philosophy, and philosophy in linguistics.James Higginbotham - 2002 - Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (5-6):573-584.
The Vastness of Natural Languages.D. Terence Langendoen & Paul M. Postal - 1986 - Linguistics and Philosophy 9 (2):225-243.
The concept of situation in linguistics.Claude Germain - 1979 - Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
Introduction.David E. Johnson & Lawrence S. Moss - 1997 - Linguistics and Philosophy 20 (6):571-574.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-07-30

Downloads
29 (#521,313)

6 months
6 (#431,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references